A change to a payment service is planned by the application team alone. When deployed, it breaks a downstream reporting service and leaves the support team without updated documentation. Which guiding principle would most likely have prevented this?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 2. The ITIL guiding principles medium
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Not correct Progress iteratively with feedback
Smaller increments might have limited the blast radius, but the root failure is treating the payment service as an isolated component rather than part of a whole.
Not correct Keep it simple and practical
This principle is about removing unnecessary steps. Following it in isolation would not have revealed the downstream dependency.
Not correct Start where you are
This principle would have prompted an assessment of existing assets, but the failure here is a missed interdependency across services and teams, which is the holistic view.
Correct Think and work holistically
Correct. No service, practice or component stands alone; the principle requires an integrated view of how all parts and all four dimensions interact to deliver value end to end.
Why
'Think and work holistically' states that no service, practice, process, department or supplier stands alone. Outputs must be coordinated across the whole organization and across the four dimensions of service management; ignoring downstream services and the people who support them is the classic breach of this principle.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 2
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 2 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- A team has been asked to replace an ageing service desk tool. Before designing anything, the team inventories the existing tool's integrations, workflows and data, and finds that several components work well and can be carried forward. Which guiding principle is the team applying? machine-checked
- An organization decides to introduce robotic process automation for its user access request handling. Its ITIL adviser insists that the approval steps are first reviewed and the redundant ones removed. What is the reasoning behind this advice? machine-checked
- A programme has been running for eleven months with no deliverable released, because the team intends to hand over the complete solution in one go. Which guiding principle is being ignored? machine-checked
- A manager plans a service improvement using only the monthly summary reports produced by the supplier, and does not observe how the service actually runs. Which guiding principle most directly cautions against this? machine-checked
- During an improvement review, a team finds that a weekly reconciliation report is produced, circulated and archived, but no one uses it for any decision. Which guiding principle states directly that an activity like this should be eliminated? machine-checked
- Two teams each maintain their own private backlog and status spreadsheet. Work is regularly duplicated and urgent items are deprioritized because leadership cannot see them. Which guiding principle addresses this situation? machine-checked