A manager plans a service improvement using only the monthly summary reports produced by the supplier, and does not observe how the service actually runs. Which guiding principle most directly cautions against this?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 2. The ITIL guiding principles hard
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Correct Start where you are
Correct. The principle stresses that the current state should be observed and measured directly wherever possible, because second-hand reports carry the bias of whoever produced them.
Not correct Collaborate and promote visibility
Tempting, because visibility is mentioned, but that principle is about making work visible to stakeholders and involving the right people. Here the fault is relying on reported data instead of directly assessing the current state.
Not correct Think and work holistically
This principle warns against treating components in isolation. The manager's failing is the source and reliability of the evidence, not the scope of the analysis.
Not correct Progress iteratively with feedback
Feedback loops matter, but the scenario is about how the starting position is assessed rather than about how the work is broken into iterations.
Why
'Start where you are' includes a specific caution about measurement: direct observation of the current state is preferred, because data that has been collected, filtered and summarized by others may already be distorted. Reports are useful, but they are not a substitute for seeing the service as it is.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 2
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 2 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- A team has been asked to replace an ageing service desk tool. Before designing anything, the team inventories the existing tool's integrations, workflows and data, and finds that several components work well and can be carried forward. Which guiding principle is the team applying? machine-checked
- An organization decides to introduce robotic process automation for its user access request handling. Its ITIL adviser insists that the approval steps are first reviewed and the redundant ones removed. What is the reasoning behind this advice? machine-checked
- A programme has been running for eleven months with no deliverable released, because the team intends to hand over the complete solution in one go. Which guiding principle is being ignored? machine-checked
- During an improvement review, a team finds that a weekly reconciliation report is produced, circulated and archived, but no one uses it for any decision. Which guiding principle states directly that an activity like this should be eliminated? machine-checked
- A change to a payment service is planned by the application team alone. When deployed, it breaks a downstream reporting service and leaves the support team without updated documentation. Which guiding principle would most likely have prevented this? machine-checked
- Two teams each maintain their own private backlog and status spreadsheet. Work is regularly duplicated and urgent items are deprioritized because leadership cannot see them. Which guiding principle addresses this situation? machine-checked