An organization decides to introduce robotic process automation for its user access request handling. Its ITIL adviser insists that the approval steps are first reviewed and the redundant ones removed. What is the reasoning behind this advice?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 2. The ITIL guiding principles medium
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Correct A process should be optimized before it is automated, otherwise automation simply makes a wasteful process run faster
Correct. 'Optimize and automate' has an explicit sequence: simplify and optimize first, then apply technology. Automating waste only industrializes the waste.
Not correct Automation is only permitted once a process has been fully documented and audited
The principle does not impose a documentation or audit precondition. The stated sequencing concern is optimization first, not paperwork first.
Not correct Technology should be used only where human resources are unavailable
This inverts the intent. Automation is used to free human attention for complex decision-making, not merely as a last resort when people are missing.
Not correct Automation must always deliver a measurable cost reduction before it is approved
Value from automation is not restricted to cost saving, and no such approval gate is part of the principle. The relevant point is the optimize-then-automate order.
Why
'Optimize and automate' is a two-word principle in a deliberate order. Optimization makes something as effective and useful as possible; automation then applies technology to the improved way of working. Automating an unoptimized process locks in its inefficiencies and reproduces them at speed and scale.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 2
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 2 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- A team has been asked to replace an ageing service desk tool. Before designing anything, the team inventories the existing tool's integrations, workflows and data, and finds that several components work well and can be carried forward. Which guiding principle is the team applying? machine-checked
- A programme has been running for eleven months with no deliverable released, because the team intends to hand over the complete solution in one go. Which guiding principle is being ignored? machine-checked
- A manager plans a service improvement using only the monthly summary reports produced by the supplier, and does not observe how the service actually runs. Which guiding principle most directly cautions against this? machine-checked
- During an improvement review, a team finds that a weekly reconciliation report is produced, circulated and archived, but no one uses it for any decision. Which guiding principle states directly that an activity like this should be eliminated? machine-checked
- A change to a payment service is planned by the application team alone. When deployed, it breaks a downstream reporting service and leaves the support team without updated documentation. Which guiding principle would most likely have prevented this? machine-checked
- Two teams each maintain their own private backlog and status spreadsheet. Work is regularly duplicated and urgent items are deprioritized because leadership cannot see them. Which guiding principle addresses this situation? machine-checked