On day four of a two-week Sprint a stakeholder stops a Developer in the corridor and asks for a "two-line change" to a screen the team is working on right now. A team-mate later says all stakeholder contact must go through the Product Owner and the Developer should never have taken the conversation. What is accurate?

Professional Scrum Master I, objective 3. Managing products with agility medium

Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.

Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.

The options

Not correct The team-mate is right — Developers do not talk to stakeholders, because the Product Owner is the Scrum Team's single channel to the business

Wrong, and it is the rule teams invent most often. Scrum makes the whole Scrum Team responsible for product-related activities including stakeholder collaboration; a team that will not talk to the people it builds for starves itself of the information it needs.

Not correct The Developer may take the change in if it is genuinely small and can be absorbed without slipping the Sprint Goal

Wrong, and this is the most tempting option because it sounds pragmatic and protects the Sprint Goal. The Sprint Backlog is the Developers' plan for reaching the Sprint Goal, not an intake queue — new product scope is Product Backlog content, and only the Product Owner decides whether it becomes work.

Correct The conversation was fine, but the request is a change to what the product does, so it goes to the Product Owner and any renegotiation of this Sprint's scope happens with them

Correct. It separates the two things the corridor conversation confuses: talking to a stakeholder is the Scrum Team's job, while deciding what the product will do is the Product Owner's.

Not correct The Scrum Master should step in and stop stakeholders approaching Developers during a Sprint

Wrong, and precisely backwards. A Scrum Master's job in the organisation includes removing barriers between stakeholders and Scrum Teams; erecting one is the opposite of the accountability.

Why

Two questions hide inside every corridor request, and PSM I is asking you to pull them apart. May we talk — yes, always, because stakeholder collaboration is product work the Scrum Team owns. Who decides whether it gets built and when — the Product Owner, working the Product Backlog. Teams that answer the second question by banning the first end up with an isolated team and a Product Owner relaying messages, which is slower and less transparent than the problem it was meant to solve.

Where this comes from

Cited
Scrum Guide section The Sprint
What it says
Scope may be clarified and renegotiated with the Product Owner as more is learned.

Practise this

Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a set from objective 3 and space the ones you get wrong.

Practise Professional Scrum Master I

More questions on this objective

All questions on Managing products with agility