Two key customers say they have not spoken to anyone on the Scrum Team in four months. A programme office requires every request and every question to be filed on a form it triages monthly, and the Product Owner admits she is ordering the Product Backlog from second-hand summaries. What does Scrum make the Scrum Master's job here?

Professional Scrum Master I, objective 3. Managing products with agility medium

Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.

Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.

The options

Correct Work on the intake process itself, because removing barriers between stakeholders and Scrum Teams is one of the ways a Scrum Master serves the organisation

Correct. The monthly form is exactly the kind of barrier the accountability names — it is not a background constraint the team must live with, it is the impediment.

Not correct Accept the process as an organisational reality and coach the Product Owner to write better Product Backlog items from the summaries

Wrong. It treats a removable barrier as a fixed constraint and spends the Scrum Master's effort improving the quality of second-hand information rather than restoring the first-hand kind.

Not correct Take over the intake form themselves, triaging requests weekly so they reach the Product Owner faster

Wrong, and it is a comfortable trap: it feels like service and it does speed things up. But it moves the gate rather than removing it, and it makes the Scrum Master the new filter between stakeholders and the team.

Not correct Escalate to the programme office's sponsor and ask that the Scrum Team be exempted from the reporting requirement

Wrong. A Scrum Master leads, trains and coaches the organisation in its Scrum adoption; an exemption won by escalation changes nothing anyone understands, and the goal is contact restored, not paperwork avoided.

Why

Empiricism runs on contact with reality, and stakeholders are where much of that reality lives. A process that meters that contact monthly does not slow Scrum down a little — it starves the inspection the Sprint Review is meant to perform. That is why removing barriers between stakeholders and Scrum Teams sits in the Scrum Master's service to the organisation rather than in their service to the team: the barrier is usually built outside the team, by people acting reasonably.

Where this comes from

Cited
Scrum Guide section Scrum Master
What it says
Removing barriers between stakeholders and Scrum Teams.

Practise this

Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a set from objective 3 and space the ones you get wrong.

Practise Professional Scrum Master I

More questions on this objective

All questions on Managing products with agility