A new Scrum Master is asked by a director where in Scrum the organisation gets to see whether the last four weeks of work were worth anything, and what should change as a result. Which event is she describing?

Professional Scrum Master I, objective 3. Managing products with agility easy

Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.

Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.

The options

Not correct The Sprint Retrospective, where the team examines how the Sprint went

Wrong, and it is the near miss. The Retrospective inspects how the Scrum Team works — people, interactions, process, tools — not what the product is now worth to anyone.

Not correct The Daily Scrum, where progress toward the Sprint Goal is inspected every day

Wrong. The Daily Scrum is the Developers' fifteen minutes to inspect progress and adapt their plan for the next working day; it is not where stakeholders judge value.

Not correct Sprint Planning, where the Product Owner proposes how the product could increase its value

Wrong on timing. Planning is where value is proposed and a Sprint Goal is agreed; it comes before the work rather than after it, so there is no outcome to inspect yet.

Correct The Sprint Review, whose purpose is to inspect the outcome of the Sprint and determine future adaptations

Correct. It is the one event that turns the Increment outward — the Scrum Team and key stakeholders look at what was actually accomplished and at what has changed around them, then decide what to do next.

Why

The two inspection events at the end of a Sprint are easy to confuse and the exam relies on it. Sprint Review looks outward at the product and its environment and asks whether the outcome was valuable; Sprint Retrospective looks inward at the Scrum Team and asks how it works. Note the word outcome — the Review is not a demo of output, and the Guide is explicit that it is a working session the Scrum Team should avoid limiting to a presentation.

Where this comes from

Cited
Scrum Guide section Sprint Review
What it says
The purpose of the Sprint Review is to inspect the outcome of the Sprint and determine future adaptations.

Practise this

Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a set from objective 3 and space the ones you get wrong.

Practise Professional Scrum Master I

More questions on this objective

All questions on Managing products with agility