An expenses application has every feature the finance team asked for, but it is unavailable for several hours most weeks and claims are frequently submitted late as a result. Which assessment fits ITIL's treatment of utility and warranty?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 1. Key concepts of service management hard
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Correct Utility is present but warranty is insufficient, so the service does not enable the intended value
Correct. The functionality is there (fit for purpose) but the assurance of performance is not (not fit for use). Both are needed for a service to enable value.
Not correct Warranty is present but utility is insufficient, because the outcome is not being achieved
Wrong. It inverts the terms. The missing element is availability, which is warranty; the requested features, which are utility, are all present.
Not correct Utility is sufficient on its own, so the service enables value regardless of availability
Wrong. ITIL is explicit that utility alone is not enough; a service that does the right thing unreliably fails the consumer's outcomes.
Not correct Utility and warranty are both adequate; the shortfall is the consumer failing to play its part in value co-creation
Wrong. Co-creation does require the consumer to contribute, but nothing here points to that: the reported failure is the service being unavailable, which is an assurance of performance and therefore warranty.
Why
A service enables value only when utility and warranty are both adequate. Utility asks whether the service supports the required performance or removes constraints — fit for purpose. Warranty asks whether it will meet agreed requirements in areas such as availability, capacity, security and continuity — fit for use. Failing either one blocks the outcome.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 1
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 1 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- Which statement best completes the ITIL definition of a service? A service is a means of enabling value co-creation by facilitating outcomes that customers want to achieve, without ... machine-checked
- A provider delivers a payroll service. Each month it produces a set of payslip files and a bank payment instruction. As a result, the consumer's staff are paid accurately and on time. Which of these is an OUTCOME? machine-checked
- A finance director approves the annual budget that pays for a collaboration service, but never logs into it. Which service consumer role is the finance director playing? machine-checked
- Which description matches the CUSTOMER role in a service relationship? machine-checked
- A video conferencing service can host meetings of up to 200 participants and record them. It is available 99.9% of the time and all recordings are encrypted at rest. Which part of this description is UTILITY? machine-checked
- Which statement about warranty is correct? machine-checked