A team beginning an improvement is tempted to declare the current process a failure and design a replacement from a blank sheet. Which guiding principle most directly challenges this, and at which step of the continual improvement model does it bite hardest?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 7. Seven ITIL practices in detail hard
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Not correct Think and work holistically, at the 'Take action' step
Working holistically warns against treating components in isolation. Relevant in general, but the error here is ignoring the existing state, not fragmenting the work.
Not correct Keep it simple and practical, at the 'How do we get there?' step
This principle is about eliminating steps that produce no value; it applies during planning, but it does not address the specific error of discarding the current state unexamined.
Correct Start where you are, at the 'Where are we now?' step
Correct. The principle says to assess what already exists and reuse what is usable, which is precisely the work of the baseline step.
Not correct Focus on value, at the 'What is the vision?' step
Focus on value does belong near the vision step, but it addresses whether the improvement serves the consumer, not whether the current state was properly assessed first.
Why
'Start where you are' says not to start over without first assessing what is already in place, because existing services, processes and people often contain much that can be reused. That assessment is exactly the 'Where are we now?' step, where measurement of the current state establishes the baseline. The other principles are real, but none of them names the failure described.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 7
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 7 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- Which statement best describes what the incident management practice is intended to achieve? machine-checked
- How is an incident defined in ITIL? machine-checked
- Several incidents are open at once and the support team must decide which to work on first. On what basis should the order be decided? machine-checked
- A difficult incident is worked on by pulling several specialists from different teams into the same session at the same time; once it becomes clear who is best placed to continue, the others step away. What is this technique called? machine-checked
- Why does an organisation define a separate procedure for major incidents rather than handling them exactly like all other incidents? machine-checked
- A support team routinely fixes incidents by phone and updates the incident record only with the word 'fixed'. What is the most significant consequence of this? machine-checked