An organisation closes its single co-located help desk and instead staffs the function from three countries, with every contact arriving through one shared tool alongside a chatbot. A manager claims the organisation therefore no longer has a service desk. Is that right?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 7. Seven ITIL practices in detail medium
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Not correct Yes. Once contacts are handled through automation the work becomes service request management instead
The channel a contact arrives through does not decide which practice owns it. Request fulfilment is a separate practice whether the contact came by phone or by chatbot.
Not correct Yes. ITIL requires the service desk to be a single co-located team so that knowledge is shared directly between agents
No such requirement exists. Co-location can help, but it is a design choice, not part of what makes something a service desk.
Correct No. The service desk is a practice and a point of contact, not a physical location or a single team, so a distributed arrangement is still a service desk provided it remains the single point of contact for users
Correct. What defines the service desk is its position in the flow, as the entry point where user demand is captured, not where its staff sit or how many teams they belong to.
Not correct No, but only because the chatbot is present; distributed human staff on their own would not constitute a service desk
Automation is not what makes a service desk. Distributed human staff acting as the single point of contact would qualify on their own.
Why
The service desk is defined functionally rather than physically. This matters in practice, because it is what allows follow-the-sun staffing, outsourced tiers and automated channels to sit inside one practice, so long as users still have one recognisable way in and their contacts are acknowledged, classified, owned and actioned consistently.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 7
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 7 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- Which statement best describes what the incident management practice is intended to achieve? machine-checked
- How is an incident defined in ITIL? machine-checked
- Several incidents are open at once and the support team must decide which to work on first. On what basis should the order be decided? machine-checked
- A difficult incident is worked on by pulling several specialists from different teams into the same session at the same time; once it becomes clear who is best placed to continue, the others step away. What is this technique called? machine-checked
- Why does an organisation define a separate procedure for major incidents rather than handling them exactly like all other incidents? machine-checked
- A support team routinely fixes incidents by phone and updates the incident record only with the word 'fixed'. What is the most significant consequence of this? machine-checked