After introducing a self-service portal and a chatbot, an organisation finds that far fewer contacts now reach a human service desk agent. The finance director proposes replacing the experienced agents with junior staff. What is the strongest ITIL-based objection?
ITIL 4 Foundation, objective 7. Seven ITIL practices in detail hard
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
How these questions are written — where each question comes from, what the verification ledger records, and what happens when one is found wrong.
The options
Not correct Self-service portals and chatbots are not recognised by ITIL as legitimate service desk channels
They are explicitly recognised alongside phone, email and walk-up. The objection is about the effect on the remaining work, not about channel legitimacy.
Not correct ITIL requires a fixed ratio of service desk staff to supported users, whatever the channel mix
No such ratio exists. Staffing is a local design decision informed by demand, not a prescribed number.
Correct Automation absorbs the simple and repeatable contacts, so what still reaches a person is disproportionately the exceptions and the complex cases, which call for more capable staff rather than less
Correct. Shifting routine work to automated channels raises the average difficulty of the remaining human contacts, so the skill profile the desk needs goes up, not down.
Not correct Every automated channel must be supervised in real time by a senior agent
There is no such rule. Supervision may be sensible, but it is not the reason experienced staff are still needed once routine contacts are automated.
Why
This is the usual consequence of shifting routine demand left. It also connects to the capability profile the practice calls for: service desk staff need empathy, communication and business understanding as much as deep technical skill, and both matter more, not less, when only the awkward contacts remain.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- ITIL 4 syllabus clause 7
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a short set from objective 7 and space the ones you get wrong.
More questions on this objective
- Which statement best describes what the incident management practice is intended to achieve? machine-checked
- How is an incident defined in ITIL? machine-checked
- Several incidents are open at once and the support team must decide which to work on first. On what basis should the order be decided? machine-checked
- A difficult incident is worked on by pulling several specialists from different teams into the same session at the same time; once it becomes clear who is best placed to continue, the others step away. What is this technique called? machine-checked
- Why does an organisation define a separate procedure for major incidents rather than handling them exactly like all other incidents? machine-checked
- A support team routinely fixes incidents by phone and updates the incident record only with the word 'fixed'. What is the most significant consequence of this? machine-checked