Which TWO of these belong to the Sprint Review as Scrum describes it?
Professional Scrum Master I, objective 1. Understanding and applying the Scrum framework medium
Machine-checked — no person has signed for it. This question was read against the source cited below by an automated pass, which found no contradiction. That is a weaker claim than it sounds: the same kind of process wrote the question, so it can confirm its own mistake.
Treat it as a good draft rather than as settled fact, and read the source below before you rely on it. It is not used in mock exams here — only questions a person has signed for are.
The options
Choose 2.
Correct Reviewing what has changed in the team's environment, and collaborating with stakeholders on what to do next
Correct. The environment is half the input: an Increment can be flawless and still be the wrong next move because the market, the regulation or the competition moved during the Sprint.
Correct Adjusting the Product Backlog to meet new opportunities
Correct. This is the adaptation the Sprint Review produces, and it is the reason an unchanged Product Backlog after a Review is worth investigating.
Not correct Formally accepting or rejecting each item so that the Product Owner can sign the Sprint off
Wrong. Scrum has no acceptance ceremony and no sign-off. An item either meets the Definition of Done or it does not, and one that does not returns to the Product Backlog for future consideration.
Not correct Agreeing how the Scrum Team will improve the way it works next Sprint
Wrong event, and it is the pairing candidates confuse most. Improving how the team works is the Sprint Retrospective, which follows the Review and concludes the Sprint.
Not correct Producing the detailed plan for the next Sprint's work
Wrong. The plan for the next Sprint is created at that Sprint's Sprint Planning. The Review shapes what the next Sprint should be about; it does not lay out how the work will be done.
Why
Keep the three inspection events apart by what each one adapts. The Daily Scrum adapts the Sprint Backlog — today's plan. The Sprint Review adapts the Product Backlog — what the product should do next. The Sprint Retrospective adapts the Scrum Team itself — how it works. Almost every question about "which event" resolves by asking which of those three artifacts or subjects is being changed.
Where this comes from
- Cited
- Scrum Guide section Sprint Review
- What it says
- Based on this information, attendees collaborate on what to do next. The Product Backlog may also be adjusted to meet new opportunities.
Practise this
Reading one question is not practice. The trainer will draw a set from objective 1 and space the ones you get wrong.
Practise Professional Scrum Master I
More questions on this objective
- A department is choosing an approach for a product where both the requirements and the technology are poorly understood and keep changing as the team learns. Someone argues for Scrum "because it is founded on empiricism". What does founding an approach on empiricism actually commit the team to? machine-checked
- At the end of a Sprint three items are functionally complete but have not been through the automated test suite the Definition of Done requires. To avoid an awkward conversation the Developers mark them Done on the board and include them in the Sprint Review. Which pillar has been damaged, and what follows from that? machine-checked
- A Scrum Team holds every event on schedule, keeps a burn-down chart and reviews its metrics carefully. For six Sprints running, the same impediment — a two-day wait for a shared test environment — has been named in the Retrospective, and nothing about it has changed. What is the accurate diagnosis? machine-checked
- Mid-Sprint, the Developers discover that a third-party API rate-limits far below what they assumed, which makes the current plan unworkable. One of them suggests carrying on as planned and raising it at the Sprint Retrospective, so the Sprint is not disrupted. What should happen instead? machine-checked
- Which THREE of these statements about Scrum theory are accurate as the framework defines it? machine-checked
- A Developer is fairly sure the design the team agreed last week will not scale. The team is halfway through the Sprint, everyone else seems content, and saying so means an uncomfortable conversation and probably rework. Which Scrum value most directly asks them to speak? machine-checked
All questions on Understanding and applying the Scrum framework